Here is a timeline of events that took place Tuesday afternoon in the John Johnchuck trial.

4:40 p.m. update: The second evaluation will now take place Wednesday morning. Court is done for the day.

4:05 p.m. update: A second doctor has been summoned by the judge for an evaluation of John Jonchuck. The doctor was to arrive in court in about an hour.

3:45 p.m. update: The judge has dismissed jurors for the day. She has told them to report back at 1 p.m. Wednesday unless they are called and told otherwise.

3:40 p.m. update: Dr. Jill Poorman told court she believes John Jonchuck is competent.

3:20 p.m. update: The John Jonchuck trial has been halted as the judge wants Jonchuck to undergo a competency test. Court Psychologist Jill Poorman was doing the evaluation. It wasn't immediately clear how long that would take. Jonchuck's defense expressed concerns that he was hallucinating.

Read previous Tuesday coverage below, and follow Cait McVey's updates on Twitter here.

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — After a 3-day hiatus, the John Jonchuck murder trial resumed with both sides questioning the defense's expert witness. 

Dr. Scot Machlus, a forensic psychologist, spent Tuesday morning answering questions from the defense, as well as being cross-examined by the state. 

Machlus was also on the stand on Friday before the trial's 3-day break. Witness testimony has resumed in the John Jonchuck murder trial. 

Jonchuck's attorneys are trying to prove he was insane when he dropped his 5-year-old daughter Phoebe off the approach of the Skyway Bridge to her death on January 8, 2015. 

Machlus said Friday that Jonchuck was experiencing delusions and hallucinations in the hours surrounding Phoebe's death. 

The state tried to poke holes in that testimony, pointing out that Machlus is being paid $175 an hour by the defense to evaluate Jonchuck. 

The prosecution also had Machlus define for the court what "confirmation bias" means. It is when a person interprets evidence only in a way that goes along with a pre-exisiting belief. 

Then the state pointed out a statement from Jonchuck's childhood: that he allegedly made in a police report that the doctor reviewed and the state said to disregard. 

According to the prosecution, a 12-year-old Jonchuck said that if he ever got in trouble one day, that he would claim insanity. 

When Machlus confirmed that, the prosecutor said, "so you cherry picked from that interview with parts that were good for you and excluded a part that was bad for you?"  

The defense's objection was then overruled. 

The judge let that piece of information in as evidence. 

The state ran with it, saying that if other parts of Jonchuck's childhood are being considered by defense experts, that should be as well. 

If found guilty by reason of insanity, he would likely spend the rest of his life in a mental institution. However, if jurors don't agree with the defense, then Jonchuck, 29, could go to prison for the rest of his life. 

Stay with Spectrum News for updates from court. You can also follow Cait McVey on Twitter.

LIVE UPDATES FROM COURT: